poi-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrew C. Oliver" <acoli...@apache.org>
Subject Re: The Record class
Date Mon, 23 Jun 2003 13:40:02 GMT
I think they are the cruft of the malt, once the brew has fermented you can
safely throw out the yeast.  Just make sure nothing breaks somewhere else.

-Andy

On 6/23/03 8:29 AM, "Glen Stampoultzis" <gstamp@iinet.net.au> wrote:

> 
> I was just looking at the record class and noticed that idea was showing
> the following fields in gray:
> 
>    private short  id   = 0;
>    private short  size = 0;
>    private byte[] data = null;
> 
> The tooltip indicated that the fields are assigned but never
> accessed.  This is probably not a big deal for id or size but the reference
> to the data array could cause us to use more memory than we otherwise would.
> 
> Would anyone object to me removing these fields from the Record
> class?  Non-reply will be taken as a go ahead Glen - remove away.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> Glen Stampoultzis
> gstamp@iinet.net.au
> http://members.iinet.net.au/~gstamp/glen/
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: poi-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: poi-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 

-- 
Andrew C. Oliver
http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp
Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI

http://jakarta.apache.org/poi
For Java and Excel, Got POI?


Mime
View raw message