poi-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrew C. Oliver" <acoli...@apache.org>
Subject Re: The Record class
Date Mon, 23 Jun 2003 13:41:16 GMT
At one time I used it as a "not a real record" id...  It should probably be
unused at this point...in fact it probably serves for the popular confusion.

On 6/23/03 8:53 AM, "Glen Stampoultzis" <gstamp@iinet.net.au> wrote:

> 
> Actually the sid field is also unused by the looks of it.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Glen
> 
> 
> At 10:29 PM 23/06/2003, you wrote:
> 
>> I was just looking at the record class and noticed that idea was showing
>> the following fields in gray:
>> 
>>     private short  id   = 0;
>>     private short  size = 0;
>>     private byte[] data = null;
>> 
>> The tooltip indicated that the fields are assigned but never
>> accessed.  This is probably not a big deal for id or size but the
>> reference to the data array could cause us to use more memory than we
>> otherwise would.
>> 
>> Would anyone object to me removing these fields from the Record
>> class?  Non-reply will be taken as a go ahead Glen - remove away.
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> 
>> Glen Stampoultzis
>> gstamp@iinet.net.au
>> http://members.iinet.net.au/~gstamp/glen/
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: poi-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: poi-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>> 
> 
> 
> Glen Stampoultzis
> gstamp@iinet.net.au
> http://members.iinet.net.au/~gstamp/glen/
> 

-- 
Andrew C. Oliver
http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp
Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI

http://jakarta.apache.org/poi
For Java and Excel, Got POI?


Mime
View raw message