poi-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Avik Sengupta" <avik.sengu...@itellix.com>
Subject Status: Towards 2.0
Date Tue, 07 Oct 2003 16:41:22 GMT
The following is the status of all bugs mentioned in Andy's original post about &quot;must
fix&quot; bugs for 2.0 final release. For more context, please see the original mail below.
As you can see, we are making good progress (even if i say so myself :) with over half the
list already done.  

The biggest issue remaining is the international strings problem (12843). Some are simple
that i'll do over the next week or so. After that, i'll address individual issues on the list,
and we can decide if we want each of them to block the 2.0 release. 


13424	NOT DONE
13921	NOT DONE
14734	Fixed in HEAD. Will it go to branch? Rainer?
14824	Glen says fixed (will u close the bug?)
15375	Probably done, waiting for confirmation
16488	NOT DONE
16559	NOT DONE
16560	NOT DONE
16756	Shawn says its Fixed (will u close the bug?)
16985	NOT DONE (Avik)
17196	NOT DONE – we need better testcases, i dont think this is a “general” issue
17329	Danny says its Fixed (will u close the bug?)
17374	NOT DONE – trivial
17494	NOT DONE
18800	NOT DONE – needs confirmation
19321	NOT DONE
19599	NOT DONE
19961	Fixed
20048	WontFix
20550	Reportedly fixed. To check with testcase
21066	Fixed (Glen is this in branch as well?)
21646	DUP 15375
14493	Unlikely – needs more confirmation/testcase b4 it can be fixed
9576	Fixed in HEAD by Jason. Open issue on BRANCH
12843	NOT DONE (may solve 12561,15556,22742 .. we desperately need more “double byte” testers
who can test the patch and report back!)
13229	NOT DONE (forrest issue – Glen?)
13478	Done
15008	NOT DONE (Andy/Tetsuya?)
16985	NOT DONE (not a patch) Avik
18837	NOT DONE
18846	Marked fixed, but dont know if applied (Tetsuya?)
21444	Done
21673	Closed via 21444
21674	Done
21722	Done
41330	Fixed
13796	Fixed
14460	Fixed
15228	Done

On 7/24/03 1:22 PM, &quot;Andrew C. Oliver&quot; &lt;acoliver@apache.org&gt;

&gt; Before we release 2.0, the following are &quot;must fix&quot; bugs IMHO.
 Some need to
&gt; be researched and invalidated (if they aren't valid) or noted as &quot;can't
&gt; till 3.0&quot; (if they aren't tooooo serious and aren't blockers):
&gt; 1. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6802
&gt; 2. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11744
&gt; 3. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12561 (Tetsuya?)
&gt; 4. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12730
&gt; 5. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13224 (Avik &amp; me)
&gt; 6. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13249 (Avik?)
&gt; 7. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13424 (ALL)
&gt; 8. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13921
&gt; 9. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14734 (Rainer)
&gt; 10. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14824
&gt; 11. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15375 (Glen?)
&gt; 12. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16488 (investigate)
&gt; 13. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16559 (Danny)
&gt; 14. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16560 (Danny)
&gt; 15. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16756
&gt; 16. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16985
&gt; 17. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17196 (Avik &amp; Andy)
&gt; 18. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17329 (fixed?)
&gt; 19. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17374 (Andy)
&gt; 20. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17494
&gt; 21. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18800
&gt; 22. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19321
&gt; 23. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19599 (Tetsuya?)
&gt; 24. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19961
&gt; 25. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20048
&gt; 26. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20550
&gt; 27. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21066
&gt; 28. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21646
&gt; Unlikely (Stranger than fiction) :
&gt; 1. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14493
&gt; 1. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9576
&gt; 2. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12843
&gt; 3. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13229 (Glen, is this
&gt; relevant any more?)
&gt; 4. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13478 (Chris convinced
&gt; me)
&gt; 5. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15008 (Tetsuya)
&gt; 6. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16985 (Tetsuya)
&gt; 7. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18837
&gt; 8. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18846 (Tetsuya)
&gt; 9. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21444 (AndY)
&gt; 10. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21673
&gt; 11. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21674
&gt; 12. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21722 (Andy)
&gt; Formula related, should look into (may not fix for 2.0-final)
&gt; * we probably shouldn't completely CHOKE on these when they can't be read
&gt; for final *
&gt; 1. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14330
&gt; 2. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13796
&gt; 3. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14460
&gt; Stuff Avik and I haven't committed yet:
&gt; 1. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15228
&gt; Lets try and work through these so we can get 2.0 out of the door!

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message