poi-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kalyan Dev <kalyan.opensou...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Candidates for cleanup
Date Wed, 03 Aug 2011 08:35:24 GMT
Hi Mark,

I completely agree with your concern. However, All the StringBuffer to
StringBuilder changes were in toString() implementation of the class. This
human readable string might just be used mostly in Loggers which is not of
high significance (carrying transactional data).


On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Mark Beardsley <markbrdsly@tiscali.co.uk>wrote:

> I know that I am no longer involved in the project and think you will
> already
> have considered this. However, I did feel it worthwhile mentioning that
> StringBuilder is not thread safe (StringBuffer is of course) and that this
> is where the time savings accrue. Do not know if this matters but it might
> mitigate against a blanket substitution of StringBuilder for StringBuffer.
> Yours
> Mark B
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/Candidates-for-cleanup-tp4649896p4661313.html
> Sent from the POI - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message