poi-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dominik Stadler <dominik.stad...@gmx.at>
Subject Re: Switch to maven?
Date Wed, 09 Mar 2016 08:59:49 GMT

if I could choose freely, I would use Gradle by now, Maven still confuses
me quite a lot. However also Gradle has quite a learning curve, so it would
force all committers and users to learn quite a lot, so all-in-all I am
also more inclined to keep the current build-system in place. My suggestion
towards ivy was to standardize a bit how we fetch and use 3rd party stuff
to make it similar to Maven and reduce some of the code in the build.xml

And note that the stuff in sonar/ only does the bare minimum to let Sonar
do the analysis, there is quite a bit more in the Ant build: rat-check,
findbugs, correctly packaging the jars, signing, forbidden-api-check,
integration-tests, proper ooxml-lite, generate-geometry, ...


On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:20 AM, Nick Burch <apache@gagravarr.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Andreas Beeker wrote:
>> I'd keen to switch our ant build to a modulized maven build. I guess
>> there were already several discussions about this topic, but I couldn't
>> find them on a quick view.
> IIRC, the stuff for building the ooxml-lite jars was felt to be one bit
> which'd be a lot of work to change over. There was also the "haven't you
> got enough real bugs to work on, without breaking something that works" ;-)
> I expect that this change ...
>> - clean-ups the directory structures
> We could do that now, if we wanted, but it risks breaking lots of pending
> patches and private forks
> - better documents the external dependencies
> Don't the existing ant-generated maven poms have all that in? Plus the
> website, which is where most people seem to look. Well, I say most people,
> based on the stackoverflow questions most people don't bother, guess, guess
> wrong, and whine when people point them at the docs / tell them to use
> maven / etc...
> For a start I'd move the poi modules 1:1 to poms, but eventually I'd like
>> to have format based poms for Excel, Powerpoint, ...
> See above on large parts of our new users already stuffing things up when
> faced with basically just 3 POI jars. I really worry that if we add more,
> even more beginners won't be able to get it working and will give up /
> waste lots of time. We'd also break 10+ years of "stop being a muppet and
> follow this to fix your build by including the jars the docs tell you to"
> worth of advice out there on the internet
> (Just check stackoverflow for people confused by tutorials or guides
> mentioning the poi-contrib package, which we removed some time ago, and the
> crazy stuff they end up doing to try to get it back without understanding
> what they're doing, for why I'm reluctant to change things here without
> very strong reasons!)
> Nick
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message