qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "John O'Hara" <john.r.oh...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: java unit vs. system tests
Date Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:12:46 GMT
+1 for building the Java bits with Maven too (is this a vote?!?)

We need to make sure that the build system for Java is nice for Java users,
and the packaging for C++ et al is good for them.  Ideally they would gel

Distribution is, of course, separate from build.  So a distribution could
make more compromises than the build system.  We need to make the code as
accessable and easy to get going with as possible on all the platforms.


On 27/09/06, Robert Greig <robert.j.greig@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 27/09/06, Martin Ritchie <martin.a.ritchie@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Perhaps we should move the non-unit tests to a different package for now
> so
> > we can easily see what unit tests we have.
> That is a very good idea.
> We have some unit tests but the majority, particularly in the client
> test directory are certainly system tests.
> RG

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message