qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carl Trieloff <cctriel...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: maven
Date Tue, 05 Sep 2006 20:37:11 GMT


if we decide to add, go to.. maven builds do you mind if we do that post 
the code move to
Apache. We still have some work to do to get the code into it's new home 
and I am scared that
this might complicate this process. It might not, but I would prefer to 
get the code move
behind us before introducing this.


Alan Conway wrote:
> +1 as long as I don't have to do it ;)
> I haven't used maven a lot but from the little I've used it it seems to
> eliminate a lot of the repetative junk that gets re-hashed on every
> project. 
> The existing directory structure is very close to the maven standard so
> I don't see any big problems in the reorg.  
> On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 16:04 -0400, Steve Vinoski wrote:
>> I'd like to "mavenize" the Qpid build (specifically with Maven 2, of  
>> course). We have more than a few dependencies, such as log4j, a bunch  
>> of jakarta commons stuff, some mina stuff, saxon, and xmlbeans, and  
>> maven could help manage all that and any future dependencies we  
>> create, such as for persistence. But maven brings other major  
>> benefits too, such as single commands to set up Eclipse or IntelliJ  
>> workspaces, commands to measure code coverage, commands to run code  
>> style checkers, etc. I also think the standard maven directory  
>> structure helps enforce subproject unit testing, as the tests and the  
>> sources sit in peer directories under each subproject.
>> Now would be a good time to do this, obviously, given the code moving  
>> into the incubator. Unless everyone hates the idea, I'll keep working  
>> on it in my private workspace and try to have it ready by the end of  
>> the week. Obviously, if anyone has any major concerns, please voice  
>> them here.
>> thanks,
>> --steve

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message