qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carl Trieloff <cctriel...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: java unit vs. system tests
Date Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:32:52 GMT

I would also like to see the Python systems test run across both Java 
and C++. They
do now for C++, but would like to see this to be the case with Maven.


John O'Hara wrote:
> +1 for building the Java bits with Maven too (is this a vote?!?)
> We need to make sure that the build system for Java is nice for Java 
> users,
> and the packaging for C++ et al is good for them.  Ideally they would gel
> nicely.
> Distribution is, of course, separate from build.  So a distribution could
> make more compromises than the build system.  We need to make the code as
> accessable and easy to get going with as possible on all the platforms.
> John
> On 27/09/06, Robert Greig <robert.j.greig@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 27/09/06, Martin Ritchie <martin.a.ritchie@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > Perhaps we should move the non-unit tests to a different package 
>> for now
>> so
>> > we can easily see what unit tests we have.
>> That is a very good idea.
>> We have some unit tests but the majority, particularly in the client
>> test directory are certainly system tests.
>> RG

View raw message