qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Martin Ritchie" <martin.a.ritc...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: java unit vs. system tests
Date Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:32:59 GMT
I too notice this.

Perhaps we should move the non-unit tests to a different package for now so
we can easily see what unit tests we have.

-- 
Martin


On 27/09/06, Steve Vinoski <vinoski@iona.com> wrote:
>
> On Sep 26, 2006, at 11:53 PM, Steve Vinoski wrote:
>
> > Perhaps I'm missing something, but are the Qpid Java unit tests
> > really unit tests? To me they seem more like system tests. One
> > critical aspect of a unit test is isolation, typically achieved via
> > mock objects, but when I look through the code I don't really see
> > the isolation I expect to see.
> >
> > Does anybody have any coverage figures for these tests? Perhaps
> > someone familiar with the tests could file JIRAs for the parts
> > known to lack coverage.
> >
> > Again, assuming I'm not missing something, this is another reason
> > why I advocate (and am still working on) moving to maven. It will
> > force us to get our testing structures in order, will make it
> > easier to add tests wherever required, and will also give us code
> > coverage essentially for free.
>
> Let me clarify that last sentence: maven will give us code coverage
> *measurement* essentially for free.
>
> --steve
>
>


-- 
Martin Ritchie

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message