qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hiram Chirino" <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
Subject Re: A question for the ActiveMQ chaps on the list...
Date Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:43:54 GMT
On 9/25/06, Gordon Sim <gsim@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hiram Chirino wrote:
> > So basically if the destination contained all of the binding
> > information.  The producers would be able to create the correct bind
> > request.  So that messages are delivered to the right queues.
> >
> > And since that binding information specifies queues where messages are
> > being delivered, I think the consumer side of things should have
> > enough information to create it's subscription.
> Ok, I think we got our wires crossed. Yes, I agree that it is relatively
> straightforward to map from JMS semantics onto AMQP commands.
> It is the reverse mapping that I was commenting on (i.e. responding to
> the bind request, not issuing it).

Ohhhh... Duh!  So you were talking about using AMQP to abstract out
JMS... seems wacky since JMS AMQP is more concrete and JMS is more
abstract.   And I think you might be right that there is no general
way to do that.


Blog: http://hiramchirino.com

View raw message