qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Johnson, Eric" <Eric.John...@iona.com>
Subject RE: Qpid Branding ?
Date Thu, 05 Oct 2006 14:02:21 GMT
Marnie,
I'd be happy to help with updating the docs when they are ready.
Cheers,
Eric

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marnie McCormack [mailto:marnie.mccormack@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 7:11 AM
> To: qpid-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Qpid Branding ?
> 
> I've been working on expanding the user documentation that we have for
> Qpid
> (Getting Started guide, FAQ, Troubleshooting etc) and Robert put
together
> (probably with Gordon Sim) some design docs.
> 
> Been waiting for the Confluence Wiki to be available before porting
them
> across and they could possibly do with some minor updates.
> 
> Regards,
> Marnie
> 
> On 10/5/06, Debbie Moynihan <debbiemoynihan@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Agree.  No it wasn't really meant to be an acronym, although there
were
> > some
> > ideas for an acronyn thrown around like product information delivery
or
> > something like that.  Let's see if everyone else agrees with the
> spelling
> > "Qpid" and we can adjust the logo concepts accordingly.
> >
> > Is there any existing documentation on qpid?   that would be also be
> > useful
> > as we build out the content on the wiki and the web-site.
> >
> > Deb
> >
> > On 10/5/06, Martin Ritchie <ritchiem@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Qpid seems right to me. QPid or QPID suggest an acronym which I
don't
> > > think is what we're going for?
> > >
> > > On 05/10/06, Debbie Moynihan <debbiemoynihan@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > There were some discussions about it during the renaming
process,
> but
> > > there
> > > > doesn't seem to be consistent usage.  I agree it is important to
> have
> > a
> > > > consistent name and spelling. I can have a design firm come up
with
> > some
> > > > logo concepts over the next couple days.  I've been involved in
the
> > AMQP
> > > > logo and branding discussions as part of the AMQP Working Group.
> > > >
> > > > I personally like Qpid, which is what Eric put on the project
web-
> site
> > > > docs.  Does anyone disagree with the usage of the project name
> spelled
> > > > Qpid?
> > > >
> > > > Debbie
> > > >
> > > > On 10/5/06, Marnie McCormack < marnie.mccormack@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I wondered if there's been a conversation on any mailing list
> about
> > > Qpid
> > > > > branding (logos etc) ? I remember a debate about amqp branding
on
> > the
> > > pmc,
> > > > > but haven't spotted any Qpid discussions.
> > > > >
> > > > > I noticed that across the various contributers' websites and
press
> > > > > releases
> > > > > we don't seem to be consistent about the case i.e. QPid, qpid,
> Qpid
> > > etc.
> > > > >
> > > > > Do we have a clear agreement on the branding for Qpid ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Marnie
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Martin Ritchie
> > >
> >
> >


Mime
View raw message