qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carl Trieloff <cctriel...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: [ANN] Release Candidate
Date Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:15:10 GMT

Marnie,

I believe that I have all the documentation I need for to correct it. I 
will do so.

Carl.


Marnie McCormack wrote:
> Hi Cliff,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> I've spoken to John about the spec license issue and his will be 
> raising it
> at the protocol working group today with a view to it being urgently
> addressed for Apache use.
>
> Will action/check on the other open items shortly.
>
> Regards,
> Marnie
>
>
> On 11/21/06, Cliff Schmidt <cliffschmidt@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/20/06, Rajith Attapattu <rajith77@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hey Cliff,
>> >
>> > Thanks for the great feedback. I will start working on these items.
>> > I will wait for a full review by you (and others as well) before
>> > cutting another RC.
>> > Hopefully if I receive all the feedback today I could do it at night
>> > or maybe first thing in the morning.
>>
>> Here's the only other stuff I came up with during a more thorough 
>> review:
>>
>> 1. For some reason there's a duplicate set of LICENSE in the /java
>> directory of the -src distro.  While not needed, it's okay to be there
>> as long as you keep it in synch with the root copy.
>>
>> 2. The src distribution seems to have two specs directory, one at the
>> root and one in /src.  Was this intentional?
>>
>> 3. The spec license also needs to be mentioned in the LICENSE file
>> just like the other licenses.
>>
>> 4.  And this is the most significant item: the license for the spec
>> appears to still not include the right to 'distribute'.  I pointed
>> this issue out when this project was being proposed.  It definitely
>> needs to be fixed before including the spec in an Apache distribution.
>>
>> Cliff
>>
>


Mime
View raw message