qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Rajith Attapattu" <rajit...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE][Qpid] M1 release
Date Fri, 03 Nov 2006 19:39:07 GMT
If you look at Tuscany or Axis2 we have seperate release cycles for Java and
C.

So I think it's ok for us to do a Java M1 and then a C/C++ M1 a little later
on.
Cliff can you please comments on this?

Regards,

Rajith

On 11/3/06, Carl Trieloff <cctrieloff@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Robert Greig wrote:
> > On 03/11/06, Alan Conway <aconway@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> > So here is the format
> >> >
> >> > [ ] M1 Release
> >> > [ ] Java Broker + client
> >> > [ ] Python and Ruby clients
> >
> > + 1 for all three.
> >
> > Can I also ask that we add the .NET client? I realise it has not yet
> > been committed to svn but that is due to the developer being off sick.
> > It is actually running in production now so it is stable (no changes
> > for several weeks) and just needs the files prepared for Apache. We
> > are hoping to have it done on Monday.
> I would like to do C++ also but maybe after the Java. Should we not add
> the C# to that as it is not
> in repo yet. i.e. do a M1 for C++ and C# a few weeks after Java. This is
> our first time through,
> and doing it in pieces might actually be faster so we don't have to fix
> the same mistakes in multiple
> places.... (if we make them, which I am sure we will)
>
> Rajith, if we stage, can we release them all as M1?
>
> +1 for all above in Rajith's list.
>
> Carl.
> >
> > RG
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message