qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alan Conway <acon...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: Qpid C++ status
Date Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:44:25 GMT
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 09:35 +0000, Marnie McCormack wrote:
> Alan,
> 
> Just to be clear - you're talking about the branch here, rather than trunk ?

Yes, I'll put [c++ 0-9 branch] in the subject in future to make that
clear. Rest assured I would never do a commit that put the trunk in a
state like the 0-9 branch is in now (at least not on purpose...;)

It'll all be better soon...

> 
> Thanks & Regards,
> Marnie
> 
> 
> On 1/17/07, Alan Conway <aconway@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > The Qpid C++ code is in flux, I did some restructuring yesterday and
> > will do some more today. If you're working on anything and need help
> > merging give me a shout.
> >
> > Yesterday I renamed the broker-side Session classes (excluding
> > SessionContext, will rename today) to use the more AMQP-standard name
> > "Connection" and separated the "adapter" layer of the broker from the
> > Connection core class.
> >
> > Today I will move most of the Connection logic to the Channel classes
> > (client & broker) since most processing happens on a channel and in
> > particular request/response ID handling has to happen in the context of
> > a channel. Stuff for channel 0 will be handled by Channe(0) since this
> > too must have proper request-response ID handling.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Alan.
> >
> >


Mime
View raw message