qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Stitcher <astitc...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: APR dependency for C++ broker
Date Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:09:23 GMT
On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 16:15 -0500, Carl Trieloff wrote:
> Alan Conway wrote:
> > ... Stuff about looking at a replacement for apr

> Why not focus on the native posix one first?
> Carl.

I think this came from the requirement to use SSL, which the new native
layer wouldn't do.

Having said that I tend to agree we should get that done first, as I
think the refactoring involved will be useful for any further work. Or
at least it should be a move in that direction if done corredctly.


View raw message