qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marnie McCormack" <marnie.mccorm...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Qpid C++ status
Date Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:45:35 GMT
Thanks :-)

Marnie


On 1/18/07, Alan Conway <aconway@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 09:35 +0000, Marnie McCormack wrote:
> > Alan,
> >
> > Just to be clear - you're talking about the branch here, rather than
> trunk ?
>
> Yes, I'll put [c++ 0-9 branch] in the subject in future to make that
> clear. Rest assured I would never do a commit that put the trunk in a
> state like the 0-9 branch is in now (at least not on purpose...;)
>
> It'll all be better soon...
>
> >
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Marnie
> >
> >
> > On 1/17/07, Alan Conway <aconway@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The Qpid C++ code is in flux, I did some restructuring yesterday and
> > > will do some more today. If you're working on anything and need help
> > > merging give me a shout.
> > >
> > > Yesterday I renamed the broker-side Session classes (excluding
> > > SessionContext, will rename today) to use the more AMQP-standard name
> > > "Connection" and separated the "adapter" layer of the broker from the
> > > Connection core class.
> > >
> > > Today I will move most of the Connection logic to the Channel classes
> > > (client & broker) since most processing happens on a channel and in
> > > particular request/response ID handling has to happen in the context
> of
> > > a channel. Stuff for channel 0 will be handled by Channe(0) since this
> > > too must have proper request-response ID handling.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Alan.
> > >
> > >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message