qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alan Conway <acon...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: Default virtual host (was Re: svn commit: r504087)
Date Tue, 06 Feb 2007 17:56:03 GMT
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 17:35 +0000, Gordon Sim wrote:
> Tomas Restrepo wrote:
> > It sounds to me like what people might want is to have the broker
> > configuration specify which of the configured virtual hosts will be the
> > default. That way, if the client doesn't specify a virtual host during
> > connection, it gets attached to whatever was configured as the default host.
> > No?
> That sounds like a good idea to me. From an interoperability pov I just 
> don't want to have to configure clients and brokers to explicitly use a 
> specific virtual host even in cases where they don't need them. Using an 
> empty string in the client when it doesn't care seems nice and easy.

That's consistent with the strategy for exchanges - there's the
"nameless" default exchange for publishes with an empty exchange name.

I'll JIRA for the C++ client to default to the empty string, unless
someone knows why "/" is a reasonable default for a virtual host name.

View raw message