qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Martin Ritchie" <ritch...@apache.org>
Subject Re: C++ 0-9 merge heads up
Date Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:26:37 GMT
On 06/03/07, Alan Conway <aconway@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 12:32 +0000, Martin Ritchie wrote:
> > On 05/03/07, Alan Conway <aconway@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > I'll be merging the 0-9 C++ branch (Jira QPID-400) soon, speak up if you
> > > know of any outstanding issues. The plan is to merge python first for
> > > the tests (branch python speaks both old & new protocols) then the C++
> > > codebase.
> > >
> > > I'm currently working on getting python verified against all brokers
> > > (trunk/branch, c++/java).
> >
> > Alan,
> >
> > I have the Java broker passing the python tests. I'm in the process of
> > preparing my commit. There were a couple of cases of the code just
> > being wrong, the purge for example never actually purged the messages
> > properly.
> >
> > Once I have done this I shall get mvn running the python tests.
> >
>
> Excellent, thanks. I've fixed the one failure in the C++ broker (wasn't
> sending recoverOK responses) so we should be in good shape.
>
> Cheers,
> Alan.

I didn't think that change 'extra' spec change would affect the C++ as
it is only required if nowait is false.

The Java broker also now passes the Python tests. With the transaction
fixes now in perhaps i'll have time to sort finish off the topic
matching :D

-- 
Martin Ritchie

Mime
View raw message