qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Rupert Smith" <rupertlssm...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: C++ directory re-organization
Date Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:56:17 GMT
I couldn't care less what the names are, but I would really love to
see consistent naming accross all clients, (from packages right down
to method names). If you imagine someone writing a manual for Qpid, it
would be a real shame if that manual had to have a seperate Appendix
for each client. It should really just have one describing the common
abstract API that all implement in a semantically equivalent manner.

I'm going to shut up about this now though, shouldn't derail Alan's
original topic for the thread.

On 3/5/07, Robert Godfrey <rob.j.godfrey@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > FYI: The class name in c++ is just Channel. I wouldn't be in favour of a
> > 'amq[p]' style prefix as it doesn't add much value.
> Except horrific namespace clashes over commly used names like Session,
> Message, Method... etc :-)
> -- Rob

View raw message