qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Rajith Attapattu" <rajit...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [RESULT] Qpid M2 Release
Date Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:56:31 GMT
Marnie,

Hey np, I will take care of it.

take it easy,

Rajith

On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack <marnie.mccormack@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Rajith,
>
> I'm happy for you to cut the branch (across all included technologies) -
> thanks.
>
> On the release management front, I'm afraid I'll have to opt out as I'm
> heavily loaded at the moment. I'm also heavily pregnant so working to a
> tight schedule to get everything I need to do done before riding off into
> the sunset :-)
>
> I'll still be around whilst I'm on maternity leave, but a little less
> available !
>
> Bfn,
> Marnie
>
> On 3/15/07, Rajith Attapattu <rajith77@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Marnie,
> >
> > If all parties are happy I can cut a branch for the release in the next
> > hour.
> > Marnie would u like to be the release manager for this release ?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Rajith
> >
> > On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack <marnie.mccormack@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ah. Good news and bad, imho. Happy to include Ruby but a little
> > concerned
> > > that it's not going to be release-able for reasons other than the code
> > :-)
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Marnie
> > >
> > >
> > > On 3/15/07, Carl Trieloff <cctrieloff@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Marnie,
> > > >
> > > > 3 +1's means that the vote carries, and as we have no -1's or 0's
> all
> > > > the components in the vote
> > > > should be included in M2. i.e. Ruby carried also so it must be
> > included.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Carl.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Marnie McCormack wrote:
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for your votes and input on the M2 Release vote thread.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have now tallied up the votes cast, and they look like this:
> > > > >
> > > > > [ +8 ] M2 Release inc Java, C++, .NET
> > > > > [ +6 ] Python client (plus 2 abstentions)
> > > > > [ +3 ] Ruby client (plus 5 abstentions)
> > > > >
> > > > > My reading of the discussions thus far is that the python is
> fairly
> > > well
> > > > > used and thus maintained. The Ruby seems a bit behind this in
> status
> > > and
> > > > > will shortly be subject to some additional effort (hopefully from
> > > > Kevin).
> > > > >
> > > > > Thus, I'd conclude that we should concentrate our efforts on an M2
> > > which
> > > > > only includes:
> > > > >
> > > > > Java Broker (with a caveat on the clustered broker code)
> > > > > Java Client
> > > > > C++ Broker
> > > > > C++ Client
> > > > > .NET Client
> > > > > Python Client
> > > > >
> > > > > I hope that this tallies up with the group consensus. I'll email
> > > > > separately
> > > > > on release branching and management.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > > Marnie
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message