Martin Ritchie wrote:
> The suggestion wasn't to hold up development for M2 but rather to hold
> up M2 release until development has ticked all the boxes we have set
> ourselves for M2 release. I understand the desire to get 0.9 on the
> trunk and think that should be our main driver just now but we do need
> to do a release and that release needs to contain a very stable
> release as we will not be doing another release for sometime, if
> previous discussions are anything to go by.
>
It sounds like we're in agreement that we should start the M2 branch 
soon so 0.9 work can proceed. I'd like to create the branch early to 
merge C++ - that doesn't prevent Java from holding off on the 0-9 merge 
to finish up stuff aimed at both M2 and trunk before diverging the two 
with the 0-9 merge.

Cheers,
Alan.