I'm all for Ruby, and python for that matter, but the remaining gap afaik is
user docs on the wiki.

Anyone feel inclined to add some ?

Would contribute but haven't got as far as these clients yet :-(

Bfn,
Marnie


On 3/7/07, Alan Conway <aconway@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> +1 for ruby from me also.
>
> Robert Godfrey wrote:
> > +1 for Ruby in M2 from me then
> >
> > On 07/03/07, Rafael Schloming <rafaels@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I spent some time yesterday bringing the ruby implementation in sync
> >> with the Java broker and adding some tests. I also added a test harness
> >> with a simple run-tests script similar to the python script of the same
> >> name. With these changes the ruby impl now has easily runnable test
> >> coverage for connection negotiation, channel open/close, publishing,
> and
> >> consuming basic messages.
> >>
> >> Given this I believe it would be perfectly appropriate to include it in
> >> a release perhaps with a disclaimer stating that it is newer and less
> >> used than the other clients.
> >>
> >> --Rafael
> >>
> >
>
>