qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carl Trieloff <cctriel...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: House keeping...
Date Wed, 03 Oct 2007 17:34:18 GMT
ack,
If we are still clean - let's cut RC's Friday and restart the vote 
Monday if all goes well

Carl.

Robert Godfrey wrote:
> I don't think there's a high chance... I'll be running the unit tests 
> in a loop from now on... We'll set up some other tests as well... I 
> think cutting the RC's now is ok, but we won't be in a position to 
> vote until we're satisfied there's no more failures... probably the 
> start of next week...
>
> -- Rob
>
> On 03/10/2007, *Carl Trieloff* <cctrieloff@redhat.com 
> <mailto:cctrieloff@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>
>     given that, should we go ahead and create the RC's + check them.
>     That will take a few days so we are ready to vote
>     if all goes well.
>
>     Unless you think there is a high chance of issues coming out of
>     the build.
>
>     Carl.
>
>
>
>     Robert Godfrey wrote:
>>     We think we are good now, but we are now wanting to run tests
>>     solidly for a few days to make sure there are no more issues.
>>
>>     If we can go through that without any failures then we'll be able
>>     to vote for a release.
>>
>>     Rob
>>
>>     On 03/10/2007, *Carl Trieloff* <cctrieloff@redhat.com
>>     <mailto:cctrieloff@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>         Are we then ready to create a new set of M2 RC?
>>
>>         Carl.
>>
>>
>>         Rupert Smith wrote:
>>         > I may have thought that to begin with, but then realized I
>>         had searched for
>>         > usages of Iterator.remove(), and not specifically
>>         > IdentityHashMap.Iterator.remove().
>>         >
>>         > On 02/10/2007, Robert Greig <robert.j.greig@gmail.com
>>         <mailto:robert.j.greig@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>         >
>>         >> On 02/10/2007, Rupert Smith < rupertlssmith@googlemail.com
>>         <mailto:rupertlssmith@googlemail.com>> wrote:
>>         >>
>>         >>> BTW The Qpid code does not call
>>         IdentityHashMap.Iterator.remove(), which
>>         >>>
>>         >> is
>>         >>
>>         >>> the source of the problem. So it is probably ok, even so,
>>         a HashMap
>>         >>>
>>         >> might be
>>         >>
>>         >>> safer.
>>         >>>
>>         >> Ah, I thought someone had told me that it was removing
>>         items in an
>>         >> iterator. Must have picked up the wrong end of the stick.
>>         >>
>>         >> RG
>>         >>
>>         >>
>>         >
>>         >
>>
>>
>
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message