qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Arnaud Simon <asi...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: M2.1plan
Date Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:30:11 GMT

Should we schedule a call for sharing the workload? 


On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 23:29 +0000, Aidan Skinner wrote:
> On Jan 9, 2008 10:47 PM, Robert Greig <robert.j.greig@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Is it accurate to say that all issues with the "fix for" field set to
> > M2.1 must be done for this release or is the plan just to see what is
> > done on 22 Feb? I see from Jira that there are 65 issues, a good
> > number of which have not yet been marked as "resolved".
> It *will* be accurate to say this, once we've fixed up the bugs a
> little. The list we agreed previously was:
> QPID-9, QPID-43, QPID-107, QPID-251, QPID-261, QPID-413, QPID-531,
> QPID-543, QPID-551, QPID-553, QPID-558, QPID-560, QPID-564, QPID-567,
> QPID-574, QPID-576, QPID-588, QPID-592, QPID-594, QPID-42
> > A while back one of the "themes" for the M2.1 release was going to be
> > interop. How are we doing on that? Do we have out of the box interop
> > with Rabbit or OpenAMQ (subject to its limited feature set)? Do our
> > performance tests run unmodified against those brokers?
> I think the interop stuff is better in M2.1, partly because of the
> multi-version support. I don't have anything solid to back that up
> though.
> - Aidan

View raw message