qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Rupert Smith" <rupertlssm...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: M2.1plan
Date Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:53:33 GMT
Yes, I wanted to compare with OpenAMQ and Rabbit. I think the 0.9 support
added by Robert Godfrey is aimed at getting the client to talk to OpenAMQ?
Could not get interop with Rabbit to work, despite making a few changes to
the Java. I especially wanted to run perf tests against Rabbit after reading
their 1.3M msgs/sec claims.

Issues that I know of with Rabbit are:

Qpids lack of support for access tickets but Rabbit website says they use a
Qpid compatible mode for that by default.
Extra arguments on consume method. I removed those from the Java but it
still would not work.


On 10/01/2008, Robert Greig <robert.j.greig@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 09/01/2008, Carl Trieloff <cctrieloff@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > >  Do we have out of the box interop
> > > with Rabbit or OpenAMQ (subject to its limited feature set)? Do our
> > > performance tests run unmodified against those brokers?
> > >
> > >
> > no, lot of our test use JMS and both Rabbit and OpenAMQ are not rich
> > enough to support that, can
> > only get basics going before I gave up last time tried. Not even all the
> > python test passed on them
> > last I looked.
> OK they don't support full JMS but I should have thought that a lot
> will work. We should certainly be able to do, for example, some
> pub/sub tests.
> Did you try with M2.1 Carl?
> Rupert - do you have a feel for how much of your performance test
> suite will run? It would be interesting to get comparative numbers
> across AMQP implementations.
> RG

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message