qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gordon Sim <g...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: M3 and some community clean-up
Date Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:23:04 GMT
Aidan Skinner wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Carl Trieloff <cctrieloff@redhat.com> wrote:
>> I have updated with what we have done so far, and a good part is completed.
>> Can we hash out on this thread and
>> get M3 more concrete.  i.e. are we going to wait for Ruby to support 0-10
>> before we cut M3, or will we be willing
>> to cut it with Java, JMS, C++ and .NET clients?
> We've previously agreed to do time-boxed releases, which I think is
> pretty crucial. We've kind of let it slip recently, but I think
> getting an M3  out at an agreed point in time, with clearly defined
> feature, bug fix and hard freezes is a better tack to take than trying
> to define M3 by features.

I certainly agree with the timeboxing approach in general. My one 
concern is the interoperability or lack thereof between the components 
of a release. A plan for achieving that in some form would be good to 
reach, even if it goes out past M3.

View raw message