qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Rajith Attapattu" <rajit...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: amqj
Date Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:35:17 GMT
+1 for the suggestion.

For the client side it would be good if we can consolidate all our config



On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Rafael Schloming <rafaels@redhat.com>wrote:

> Is there any intention to replace our usage of the amqj prefix in system
> properties with something a bit more obvious, like qpid? If so should we do
> this for M3?
> An initial grep suggests that it wouldn't be that daunting a change if we
> just do a mechanical replace. If we want to provide backwards compatibility,
> e.g. look for qpid.foo first and fallback to amqj.foo with a warning, then
> it would be a bit more work.
> --Rafael

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message