2008/7/31 Rajith Attapattu : > +1 for the suggestion. > > For the client side it would be good if we can consolidate all our config > into > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/qpid/trunk/qpid/java/client/src/main/java/org/apache/qpid/client/configuration/ClientProperties.java > > Regards, > > Rajith > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote: > >> Is there any intention to replace our usage of the amqj prefix in system >> properties with something a bit more obvious, like qpid? If so should we do >> this for M3? >> >> An initial grep suggests that it wouldn't be that daunting a change if we >> just do a mechanical replace. If we want to provide backwards compatibility, >> e.g. look for qpid.foo first and fallback to amqj.foo with a warning, then >> it would be a bit more work. >> >> --Rafael >> If we are going to do that can we also take a look at other items such as the two different strings we currently use in the Java client for the selector value in the arguments table. Would love to remove the various literal values too but first things first. I'm all for standardisation but as Rafi suggests backwards compatibility might be needed. Though I think we might be ok in terms of the amqj.* values, will have to check tomorrow though. cheers Martin -- Martin Ritchie