From qpid-dev-return-11225-apmail-incubator-qpid-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Thu Jul 31 18:35:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-qpid-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 7465 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2008 18:35:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2008 18:35:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 98469 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2008 18:35:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-qpid-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 98448 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2008 18:35:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact qpid-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: qpid-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list qpid-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 98437 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2008 18:35:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:35:45 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rajith77@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.245 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.245] (HELO rv-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.198.245) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:34:51 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id k29so645531rvb.0 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:35:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=x3KA02iCyWzVKSJyqG1UK7oWEiajZ8u9UotUKrG5/CI=; b=GZUNBmXBUxtrrjSQP++0JhvctvKgU6jMlKOFa9ZoKXDAGx1DX+692zKvxsKTuAJ4+k AIvekL3oC1eMvF2vhinpp7nNxHuSqLEVxWcWbei4vVJOdOpjYcaUiLabte7u5IK99U2d g3FP0X/jfiauLBEVXNDp/JlE997PPN5B0ICCM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=VKXRIVM2Bs65hjR2apxAjndXUHEybgLWkKKTn9w4t0MgcAv8uvWO5gvSzsTw3tQsd4 S0DnzNQ1wGOepzSIY3wf2RBNOZsYhE/ALpCL1AojCSmGeUFD7HMz1FopSFv73qQ/70vA Y0pfywOb7ciPDR3lFQvroa2f6yV7h/4voqhj4= Received: by 10.140.249.20 with SMTP id w20mr5473041rvh.21.1217529317941; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:35:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.209.17 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:35:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:35:17 -0400 From: "Rajith Attapattu" To: qpid-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: amqj In-Reply-To: <4891F604.8040405@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_34516_526086.1217529317922" References: <4891F604.8040405@redhat.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_34516_526086.1217529317922 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline +1 for the suggestion. For the client side it would be good if we can consolidate all our config into https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/qpid/trunk/qpid/java/client/src/main/java/org/apache/qpid/client/configuration/ClientProperties.java Regards, Rajith On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote: > Is there any intention to replace our usage of the amqj prefix in system > properties with something a bit more obvious, like qpid? If so should we do > this for M3? > > An initial grep suggests that it wouldn't be that daunting a change if we > just do a mechanical replace. If we want to provide backwards compatibility, > e.g. look for qpid.foo first and fallback to amqj.foo with a warning, then > it would be a bit more work. > > --Rafael > ------=_Part_34516_526086.1217529317922--