qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alan Conway <acon...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: Code review process (was Re: Code review agenda)
Date Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:19:30 GMT
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 20:56 +0100, Robert Greig wrote:
> 2008/8/4 Aidan Skinner <aidan@apache.org>:
> 
> > We could use Jira (every change has a Jira, right?), comment on that
> > and use the voting feature to indicate that it's been reviewed. I
> > can't see anything along the lines of tags so adding a
> > 'needs_review'/'review_ok' to the issue seems out (oh Jira, why aren't
> > you as good as Bugzilla?)
> 
> Surely the way to do this with Jira (or other issue trackers) is to
> have a new stage in the workflow which is "Awaiting Review", which
> comes after "In Progress" and before "Resolved".

+1

> Atlassian also does a tool for distributed code review that tracks
> comments etc. - I wonder if they are willing to give an open source
> licence as they are for Jira and Confluence?

How/why does such a tool differ from Jira? I'd be wary of taking on more
tools unless we can't solve the problem with the ones we have - it's
more overhead for new contributers to learn.




Mime
View raw message