qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robbie Gemmell <gemme...@dcs.gla.ac.uk>
Subject Re: JMX remoting (was Re: [jira] Commented: (QPID-1469) AMQUserManagementMBean.getCurrentJMXUser no longer returns a valid user[MESSAGE NOT SCANNED])[MESSAGE NOT SCANNED]
Date Mon, 01 Dec 2008 11:33:57 GMT
Well it does sound a little naff when put like that :P

On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 11:03 +0000, Aidan Skinner wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Robbie Gemmell <gemmellr@dcs.gla.ac.uk> wrote:
> > Could do, although the issue there is that MX4J doesnt implement the JMXMP
> > connector and instead have its own connectors based on soap, hessian, or
> > burlap which all require Jetty or such like to communicate via http, so that
> > means adding that too on broker and console sides.
> I think that's a better solution than saying "oh, hey, go download
> this other random thing if you want authentication". That's just weak.
> - Aidan

View raw message