qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rafael Schloming <rafa...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: M4 Timelines
Date Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:23:53 GMT
Carl Trieloff wrote:
> 
>>
>> I think it's too late to be moving around directories at this stage. 
>> IMHO we should focus on testing, getting the READMEs up to date, and 
>> getting JIRA cleaned up. It's always been the case that each 
>> sub-project in qpid has its own private way of doing things, and our 
>> releases are a bit inconsistent as a result. I don't think we're going 
>> to solve this issue for M4, but if we make it a focus for the next 
>> devel cycle, there's a lot we could do to improve things for M5. I 
>> think if we were to do this it would be reasonable to drop the 
>> Milestone moniker from the release at that point.
>>
> 
> I did some README clean up, which brought the question up for me.
> 
> My concern is that it is confusing.  The issue is the RELEASE_NOTE.txt 
> file in the top level talks about M2.
> 
> options:
> 
> a.) I could create a subdir for 0-8 and have top level REAME point to 
> readme's in each subdir. But NOT move the
> 0-8 client into the subdir till after the release.
> 
> b.) we can move 0-8 into a sub dir
> 
> c.) we can do a bit more of what I have started -- add comments into the 
> top level files to point to client010 files and
> strip out the out of date info around M2.
> 
> any preferences?
> 
> it can't go out with files that read like it is a M2 release.

I think (c) sounds like the appropriate measure at this point.

--Rafael


Mime
View raw message