qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marnie McCormack <marnie.mccorm...@googlemail.com>
Subject Cancelled: [VOTE] Version Numbers
Date Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:56:33 GMT
As I mentioned earlier, please start another vote if you'd like to.

Marnie

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Robert Godfrey <rob.j.godfrey@gmail.com>wrote:

> >
> > is graduatation not a good enough reason,
>
> As per Aidan's earlier comment it seems like graduation and the
> milestone numbering scheme should not be erroneously linked.
>
> > and that everyone wants to get rid of it?
> >
>
> I see this situation as akin to the vote on the Monarchy in
> Australia... The majority agrees that the current situation is
> anachronistic and wrong, but people have not yet come to a settled
> majority verdict on what it should be replaced it with.
>
> I *really* don't want to label Qpid as v0.x because I think that
> undermines the maturity that is present in the current product (you
> may even know some people releasing commercial product off the back of
> it ;-) )... However if you force me to vote now on a non M scheme I
> would have to vote for 0.x.  That would also imply that the next major
> release would be 1.0.  I actually think that when the time comes to
> move to a full X.0 release we should start at something like v3.0
> since there are at least two earlier stable baselines that people may
> be currently using.
>
> At the end of the day if the majority want to move to 0.5 or 1.5 now,
> I'm happy to abide by that decision - but I think that in the
> interests of democracy it is wrong to exclude "No change" from the
> current vote.
>
> -- Rob
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
> Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message