qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marnie McCormack <marnie.mccorm...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Qpid Documentation page
Date Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:05:23 GMT
Well put, and aside from any excitement caused (and driving Rafi to read our
docs :-), apologies for my heated response ! Having had mainly Java docs for
quite a while, and laid out in such a way that users I sent to the site
could follow them I'd admit to finding some of the top level changes quite
C++ oriented. Thus the fustration.

In the interests of good karma, I don't mind if you go ahead with the
DocumentationB page Rajith.

A list of useful JMS client docs would be a useful addition if you know what
you'd like to see there too - would be happy to contribute ?

Jonathan - would behappy for you to do that reorg-ing.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Rafael Schloming <rafaels@redhat.com>wrote:

> Marnie McCormack wrote:
>> Being honest, I like the old page far better - escpecially since I just
>> added to it/updated it :-)
>> From my pov, I think it's quite frustrating that all the
>> broker/implementation boundaries are becoming blurred in the docs & the
>> way
>> we link to them.
>> For example, the FAQ is not a Qpid wide FAQ and does not make clear which
>> features are present in which broker (see the
>> paradigms/features/performance
>> info). For now, the reality is that the language/implementation does
>> matter
>> and we should diverge the docs down those lines rather than try to
>> maintain
>> a set of 'this is now' docs.
> Believe it or not I've never actually read our documentation, however the
> controversy here inspired me to take a look, and now I feel the need  to
> supply the perspective from a fresh set of eyes.
> Comparing just the two top level pages, I found the DocumentationB page to
> be better organized. I felt like it was obvious how to find the
> documentation for a given area.
> That said, when clicking down through the links underneath the general
> portion, I have to agree that what is presented as the general FAQ is really
> mostly about the C++ broker, and the How To guides seem buried at the end of
> the FAQ page rather than being a top level link underneath the respective
> brokers.
> So my 2 cents would be keep the top level organization from DocumentationB,
> but add the How To pages in as links underneath the respective brokers, and
> pull most of the stuff from the "General" FAQ into the C++ specific
> FAQ/HowTo page linked to from the C++ Broker section.
> --Rafael
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
> Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message