qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bryan Kearney (JIRA)" <qpid-...@incubator.apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (QPID-1880) The new unmanaged objects are confusing
Date Tue, 02 Jun 2009 01:51:07 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12715332#action_12715332

Bryan Kearney commented on QPID-1880:

What would you suggest? The code is not checked in yet, so we can make changes as necessary.
Keep in mind that a method call can return either a managed object or struct, so at the very
least I think they are in the same hierarchy.

-- bk

> The new unmanaged objects are confusing
> ---------------------------------------
>                 Key: QPID-1880
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1880
>             Project: Qpid
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Qpid Managment Framework
>            Reporter: Ian Main
> IMO the newly added managed objects are confusing in that they return and look just like
the managed objects, but you are unable to call methods on them, nor use eg the refresh()
method to get a newly updated instance.
> QMF up until this point has made all objects managed and backed by an implementation.
 The addition of a data structure type could be very useful but I don't think it should share
the same name as the managed objects around which QMF revolves.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org

View raw message