qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aidan Skinner <aidan.skin...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Multiple broker control in QpidTestCase (was Re: svn commit: r791954 - /qpid/trunk/qpid/java/systests/src/main/java/org/apache/qpid/test/utils/FailoverBaseCase.java)
Date Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:20:15 GMT
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Rafael Schloming<rafaels@redhat.com> wrote:

> Aidan Skinner wrote:

>> Which nicely brings us back to the thing I was trying to address when
>> I started making these changes in the first place - Failover tests
>> need to be able to start and stop two brokers with stores.
>> PeristentStoreTest also needs to do something similar.
>
> Don't the failover tests already do this?

Not really. You can't start two brokers with stores since the stores
end up in the same place. Which is what the whole java.io.tmpdir stuff
was about in any case.

Until a couple of weeks ago the second broker ended up being in the
same VM as well. :/

- Aidan

-- 
Apache Qpid - AMQP, JMS, other messaging love http://qpid.apache.org
"A witty saying proves nothing" - Voltaire

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org


Mime
View raw message