qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alan Conway <acon...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: C++ broker: LockFile and shutdown (eliminating pid_t)
Date Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:13:25 GMT
On 12/08/2009 03:35 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> I'm looking at QPID-1951:
> Eliminating ssize_t is trivial.
> pid_t is used in a few more places though. However it is only used in
> connection with LockFile. Either internally in Lockfile or to
> communicate a pid out of LockFile so that the process can be signalled.
> It seems to me that the entire LockFile class could be better factored
> to eliminate passing non portable process ids around by delegating
> signalling the other process to the LockFile class itself. I would
> change the name to something else at that point (suggestions?). In that
> case the lockfile itself becomes just an internal part of the signalling
> mechanism.
> Following in that direction it looks to me like for Windows at least
> doing this allows you to entirely replace the lock file itself with the
> named event that is already being used.
> Steve, Alan (as you are both mostly responsible for these
> implementations) is there anything I'm missing here or is this a good
> direction?

That sounds like the way to go to me.

Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org

View raw message