qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alan Conway <acon...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: Rename drain and spout? qpid-python-test ....
Date Wed, 11 Aug 2010 18:12:57 GMT
On 08/11/2010 11:28 AM, Jonathan Robie wrote:
> qpid-python-test generally assumes that programs to be executed are on
> the path.
> I wrote some Python unit tests that use drain and spout in three
> languages, and test interop. My tests specify the complete path to the
> programs, but this makes installation a little more complex.
> It would be convenient to have different program names that can coexist
> on the path, e.g.
> python-send
> python-receive
> cpp-send
> cpp-receive
> java-send
> java-receive
> Would renaming these examples in this way have any significant
> disadvantages?

I'm not keen on putting the language in the name of the program. People using a 
program typically care about what it does, not what language it's written in. I 
think qpid-send and qpid-receive are the kind of programs that we want to 
install as debugging/testing tools, not just examples. (BTW, I think we *do* 
need the qpid- prefix if we want to install these things in standard paths.) I 
don't see the user benefit to installing multiple different-language 
implementations of essentially the same program.

Interop testing is a special case, I don't think we should complicate the naming 
of programs intended for users in order to simplify our interop testing. Perhaps 
for interop testing purposes you could copy qpid-send to qpid-cpp-send etc. in 
your path to give distinct names for purposes of the test.

Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org

View raw message