qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Amila Suriarachchi <amilasuriarach...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 0.10 release update - RC1 and status
Date Mon, 21 Mar 2011 06:01:11 GMT
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com>wrote:

> It appears you need to use 'true' instead of the documented 'True' for the
> value to make this work.
>

that worked.

thanks,
Amila.

>
> I'm not sure which is expected to be correct, but I don't see why we can't
> accept both in future. I have raised a JIRA
> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3156) to track the issue
> either
> way.
>
>
> Robbie
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Amila Suriarachchi [mailto:amilasuriarachchi@gmail.com]
> Sent: 19 March 2011 06:56
> To: dev@qpid.apache.org
> Cc: Justin Ross
> Subject: Re: 0.10 release update - RC1 and status
>
> I tried to create a durable queue like this
>
> queue = queueSession.createQueue("myQueue;{create:always, node:{durable:
> True}}");
>        QueueSender queueSender = queueSession.createSender(queue);
>        queueSender.send(textMessage);
>
> and getting this exception.
>
> Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Boolean cannot be cast
> to
> java.lang.String
>    at
>
> org.apache.qpid.client.messaging.address.AddressHelper.getDurability(Address
> Helper.java:237)
>    at
>
> org.apache.qpid.client.messaging.address.AddressHelper.fillInCommonNodeArgs(
> AddressHelper.java:222)
>    at
>
> org.apache.qpid.client.messaging.address.AddressHelper.createQueueNode(Addre
> ssHelper.java:215)
>    at
>
> org.apache.qpid.client.messaging.address.AddressHelper.getSourceNode(Address
> Helper.java:254)
>    at
>
> org.apache.qpid.client.AMQDestination.rebuildTargetAndSourceNodes(AMQDestina
> tion.java:888)
>    at
>
> org.apache.qpid.client.AMQSession_0_10.resolveAddressType(AMQSession_0_10.ja
> va:1272)
>
> thanks,
> Amila.
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Justin Ross <jross@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Robert Godfrey wrote:
> >
> >  I know Gordon said:
> >>
> >>
> >> "Specifically I'd suggest that unless anyone has specific updates to
> >> the following artefacts - and volunteers to verify the artefact for
> >> the release
> >> - we remove them from the published list:
> >>
> >> qpid-dotnet-0-8-0.10-beta.zip
> >> qpid-dotnet-0-10-0.10-beta.
> >> zip
> >> qpid-ruby-0.10-beta.tar.gz
> >>
> >> This will avoid giving false impressions about ongoing maintenance
> >> for these clients"
> >>
> >> But I think that if we are going to actually do this, we should
> >> formally vote for it, and move the codebases for these artefacts into an
> "attic"
> >> directory or similar.
> >>
> >> I'm not against removing unloved and unmaintained code... but I do
> >> feel that we should vote before adding or removing artefacts to/from
> >> the release.
> >>
> >
> > Okay.  I'll restore these to RC2 unless there's a vote to remove them.
> >
> > Justin
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> > Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
> > Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Amila Suriarachchi
> WSO2 Inc.
> blog: http://amilachinthaka.blogspot.com/
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
> Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Amila Suriarachchi
WSO2 Inc.
blog: http://amilachinthaka.blogspot.com/

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message