qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Stop publishing release artefacts for unmaintained components (was Re: 0.10 release update - RC1 and status)
Date Fri, 01 Apr 2011 14:28:13 GMT
On 31 March 2011 18:36, Gordon Sim <gsim@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 03/18/2011 03:56 PM, Justin Ross wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Robert Godfrey wrote:
>>
>>  I know Gordon said:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Specifically I'd suggest that unless anyone has specific updates to the
>>> following artefacts - and volunteers to verify the artefact for the
>>> release
>>> - we remove them from the published list:
>>>
>>> qpid-dotnet-0-8-0.10-beta.zip
>>> qpid-dotnet-0-10-0.10-beta.
>>> zip
>>> qpid-ruby-0.10-beta.tar.gz
>>>
>>> This will avoid giving false impressions about ongoing maintenance for
>>> these
>>> clients"
>>>
>>> But I think that if we are going to actually do this, we should formally
>>> vote for it, and move the codebases for these artefacts into an "attic"
>>> directory or similar.
>>>
>>> I'm not against removing unloved and unmaintained code... but I do
>>> feel that
>>> we should vote before adding or removing artefacts to/from the release.
>>>
>>
>> Okay. I'll restore these to RC2 unless there's a vote to remove them.
>>
>
> I would find it hard to vote for a new release that contained those
> artefacts unless someone could justify it through a list of changes made[1]
> (this would also have the benefit of identifying possible maintainers for
> those components to whom questions of support could be directed). I.e. I
> think that a vote will be required to keep them in, and it would be
> unfortunate to stall the whole release.
>
> However I do agree that some more explicit 'consensus gathering' on this is
> important since my previous mail did not result in any comments or
> responses. Therefore...
>
> ...please reply with your +1 / -1 vote, or cross one of the boxes for each
> of the cases below:
>
> (a)
>
> [ X ] +1, qpid-dotnet-0-8-0.10 SHOULD be removed from the 0.10 release
> [  ] -1, qpid-dotnet-0-8-0.10 should NOT be removed from the 0.10 release
> (please list changes it includes to support this vote)
>
> (b)
>
> [ X ] +1, qpid-dotnet-0-10-0.10 SHOULD be removed from the 0.10 release
> [  ] -1, qpid-dotnet-0-10-0.10 should NOT be removed from the 0.10 release
> (please list changes it includes to support this vote)
>
> (c)
>
> [ X ] +1, qpid-ruby-0.10 SHOULD be removed from the 0.10 release
> [  ] -1, qpid-ruby-0.10 should NOT be removed from the 0.10 release (please
> list changes it includes to support this vote)
>
>
> [1] My JIRA query may be at fault, but I can't see any JIRA for any of
> those components fixed for 0.9/0.10
>
>
Robbie

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message