qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rajith Attapattu <rajit...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Qpid and AMQP 1-0: Plans?
Date Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:24:33 GMT
I think we had a good discussion on this thread and some ideas/plans were
floated/discussed.
I am wondering where we are at in terms of the 1.0 plans ?

Maybe it's a good time to restart the discussion to get some ideas about
timelines or share any work that has been done in this area.

Rajith

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:31 AM, Marnie McCormack <
marnie.mccormack@googlemail.com> wrote:

> <snip>
>
>  >
> > > For eample, for Qpid users we want solid inter-op and upgrade as we
> > > introduce AMQP
> > > 1.0 and clean 0-10 1.0 inter-op for the C++ broker. For the Java broker
> > > there may also
> > > be a desire to also have 0-9 upgrade path. that is for those that know
> > > better to comment
> > > on.
> > >
> >
> Based on my knowledge, I don't think we need a 0-9 upgrade path
> specifically
> - so long as on the Java side we continue to support the JMS semantics in
> the same way (with particular reference to client exception handling on
> send()). Perhaps more of a general issue is the gaps in feature sets as we
> move forward, which we'd need to consider for 1-0 and identify which are
> obstacles we should address (e.g. operational logging, flow control
> mechanisms, firewalls, acls etc).
>
> 0-10 traffic does need to be supported in a 1-0 broker though, I think.
>
> Hth,
> Marnie
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message