qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Godfrey <rob.j.godf...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Address validation Queues vs Topics
Date Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:29:14 GMT
On 29 February 2012 14:24, Gordon Sim <gsim@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 02/29/2012 12:46 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>>
>> If a user specifies a type in their
>> address string, then I think thats the type of object they should get
>
>
> I agree.
>
>> I think the scope for anyone getting a Destination object that didnt
>> actually form a concrete Queue or Topic implementation should be
>>
>> absolutely minimal. I'd really rather prefer it didnt happen as I dont
>> think it should ever be necessary
>
>
> The only case I can see is if you want to provide backward compatibility for
> existing config files in which the node type is not specified in anyway
> (either through the address or through the queue/topic prefix to the jndi
> name).
>

Personally, I tend to think it's better for us to break compatibility
now to save the hassles that such non-specific destinations cause the
user when they actually try to use them.

-- Rob

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org


Mime
View raw message