qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Godfrey <rob.j.godf...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Request for inclusion in 0.18
Date Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:42:11 GMT
Another request for inclusion into 0.18:  QPID-4183

This fixes a problem whereby the AMQP 1.0 support in the Java broker
was inadvertently broken by some of the management work.  The changes
to the broker are isolated to the AMQP 1.0 support layer and have been
reviewed by Robbie.


On 1 August 2012 00:38, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Justin,
> Thanks for approving QPID-4164 (now merged). Could you take a look at
> QPID-4170 as well?
> (I realise you might have spotted it was still RtR when I sent the email,
> sorry; I forgot to ask Keith to press the button, he had actually reviewed
> it before I committed it)
> Thanks,
> Robbie
> On 30 July 2012 15:20, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Justin,
>> I would like to request that the following commits be considered for
>> inclusion in 0.18:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4164
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1366339
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1365832
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1367095
>> The above commits fix / add tests for an issue whereby moving/copying
>> persistent messages between queues (either manually via the management
>> interface, or automatically using a feature such as maximum-redelivery on
>> queues configured with with DLQs) can result in loss of the payload if the
>> message was originally recovered from the message store. The change is very
>> isolated (to the message stores) and trivial as-is but would look even
>> smaller if we hadn't inverted the meaning of a boolean.
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4170
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1367084
>> The above commit fixes an issue where JMX management threads can enter a
>> infite loop when viewing the content of messages affected by the issue
>> above, consuming CPU resources and creating additional lock contention in
>> the message store. The change is again very isolated (to the Queue MBean)
>> and trivial.
>> The changes were made either by Keith, Phil, or myself, and have then been
>> reviewed by at least one but usually both of the others.
>> Robbie

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@qpid.apache.org

View raw message