qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "mick goulish" <m...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: Review Request: Add security strength factor directly to security layer
Date Fri, 02 Nov 2012 07:23:54 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7562/#review13031
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- mick goulish


On Oct. 12, 2012, 4:32 p.m., Gordon Sim wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/7562/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 12, 2012, 4:32 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for qpid, michael goulish and Ted Ross.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This is really just a convenience for the AMQP 1.0 implementation, but is a small low
risk change that I think is generally useful.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug QPID-4368.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4368
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/SaslFactory.cpp 1397295 
>   /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/SaslAuthenticator.cpp 1397295 
>   /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/sys/SecurityLayer.h 1397295 
>   /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/sys/cyrus/CyrusSecurityLayer.h 1397295 
>   /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/sys/cyrus/CyrusSecurityLayer.cpp 1397295 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7562/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Make check passes.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gordon Sim
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message