qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Darryl L. Pierce" <dpie...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: UTF8 / binary strings in dynamic languages
Date Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:08:05 GMT
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 12:59:17PM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> I modified the spout.pl example to do this for both the name and value
> on properties pass in at the command line and they were seen by the Java
> drain tool (yay!).
> 
> So, narrowing down the goal slightly, WRT QPID-5067, do we want to 1)
> require the users to explicitly called utf8::upgrade() on the property
> name and value and assume that, whatever they pass in is correct, or do we
> 2) assume it for them and upgrade the string in our porcelain layer?
> 
> In this case, since message properties are always strings, the latter
> seems to me to be the right path.

Any opinions on this?

-- 
Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc.
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/


Mime
View raw message