qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (QPID-5297) [Java Broker] make the 1.0 protocol plugin use a single ProtocolEngineCreator
Date Tue, 05 Nov 2013 23:54:18 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13814421#comment-13814421

ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-5297:

Commit 1539202 from [~gemmellr] in branch 'qpid/trunk'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1539202 ]

QPID-5297: simplify the 1.0 plugin to only have a single ProtocolEngineCreator

> [Java Broker] make the 1.0 protocol plugin use a single ProtocolEngineCreator
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: QPID-5297
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5297
>             Project: Qpid
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Java Broker
>            Reporter: Robbie Gemmell
>            Assignee: Robbie Gemmell
>             Fix For: 0.25
> The 1.0 protocol plugin for the broker currently has two ProtocolEngineCreators. Certain
areas of the code (such as the 'default supported reply' handling in MultiVersionProtocolEngine#received,
and the PortAdapter and Port model objects in general) make assumption that there is only
one ProtocolEngineCreator for a given protocol version as this was always the case previously,
and so expected behaviour based on this assumption may not hold. The 1.0 protocol plugin should
also use a ProtocolEngineCreator to simplify things generally and remove the issue.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@qpid.apache.org

View raw message