qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chug Rolke" <cro...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: Review Request 22387: Windows swig warns about a union nested in a struct
Date Mon, 09 Jun 2014 21:29:02 GMT


> On June 9, 2014, 7:42 p.m., Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> > But why do we care about this warning anyway? (we could just suppress it)
> > 
> > I think the appropriate "solution", if we even need one, is to %ignore pn_atom_t.
> > 
> > Allowing swig to wrap pn_atom_t doesn't make much sense in the first place and we
have typemaps for the cases that this type is used in the API.

%ignore pn_atom_t it shall be,  thanks.


- Chug


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22387/#review45115
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 9, 2014, 7:38 p.m., Chug Rolke wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/22387/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 9, 2014, 7:38 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for qpid, Andrew Stitcher and Rafael Schloming.
> 
> 
> Bugs: PROTON-601
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-601
> 
> 
> Repository: qpid
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The fix is to take the union out of the struct.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   proton/trunk/proton-c/include/proton/codec.h 1600756 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22387/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> passes ctest windows and linux
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Chug Rolke
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message