qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (QPID-6443) Broker should have a default VHN rather than default VH
Date Sat, 30 May 2015 19:19:17 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14566154#comment-14566154

ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-6443:

Commit 1682642 from [~k-wall] in branch 'java/trunk'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1682642 ]

QPID-6443: [Java Broker] Restore accidentally removed import

> Broker should have a default VHN rather than default VH
> -------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: QPID-6443
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6443
>             Project: Qpid
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Java Broker
>            Reporter: Keith Wall
>            Assignee: Keith Wall
>             Fix For: 6.0 [Java]
> Currently the Java Broker has a concept of default virtual host, that is, the virtual
host to which the a client will connect if they don't specify a virtual host name in the connection
> Since the introduction if the VHN, the concept of default virtual host is flawed.
> If a virtual host node is stopped, the underlying VH does not exist, so its name is not
known to the Broker.  If I try to edit the Broker's attributes whilst a VNH is stopped, and
it happens that the default VH refers to it, the dialogue box contain the default virtual
host drop down gets confused as it tries to present a virtual host name that does not exist
in the drop down.  This forces the user to make a change they do not want.
> Brokers should have a default VHN, rather than VH.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@qpid.apache.org

View raw message