qpid-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "michael goulish" <mgoul...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: Review Request 33758: do something reasonable with local and remote max channels
Date Tue, 02 Jun 2015 14:50:21 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/33758/#review86217
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- michael goulish


On June 2, 2015, 6:46 a.m., michael goulish wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/33758/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 2, 2015, 6:46 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for qpid, Kenneth Giusti and Ted Ross.
> 
> 
> Repository: qpid-proton-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> PROTON-842 -- channels and sessions
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   proton-c/include/proton/transport.h d046567 
>   proton-c/src/engine/engine-internal.h 2f0cc56 
>   proton-c/src/engine/engine.c 67cc882 
>   proton-c/src/transport/transport.c e72875b 
>   tests/python/proton_tests/engine.py 924b3bc 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33758/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> I originally did large system-testing using a broker and dispatch routers to get 32K
links through a single connection.
> 
> This diff is based on what I did earlier, but improved (i think), and with a couple mistakes
corrected.  Now I am testing only with proton unit tests included with this diff, because
latest dispatch is having an issue with latest proton.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> michael goulish
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message