qpid-proton mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rafael Schloming <...@alum.mit.edu>
Subject Re: possible cool change to pn_messenger_route()
Date Tue, 09 Apr 2013 19:59:02 GMT
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Michael Goulish <mgoulish@redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> I like your  pattern --> { broadcast, balance, failover } ( addr, addr,
> ... addr )
> idea a lot better than my multiple rules w/ same pattern.
>
> I just think runtime-adaptive address translation could be very powerful.
>
> i.e. for failover scenario, think of (old) Qpid clustering -- when one node
> failed, a new node with a new addr stands up -- and advertises its addr.
> It would get added to this rule
>
>     pattern -->  failover ( addr1, addr2, addr_new )
>
> And the dead node deleted.
>

I agree it is a very tantalizing possibility. I think application-specific
content based routing is the killer motivating scenario as that is
something where you couldn't use a turn-key router, and also not something
you are going to do via a config file.

--Rafael

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message